Tin can Independents vote for Libertarians, and your other Pennsylvania midterm election questions

We want to know what *yous want to know.*

Spotted at the Calvary Episcopal Church in Shadyside on Election Day 2016.

Spotted at the Calvary Episcopal Church in Shadyside on Election Twenty-four hours 2016.

JASMINE GOLDBAND / THE INCLINE

HARRISBURG — Every bit part ofThe Incline's elections coverage, we want know what *you want to know* near voting and the midterms in Pennsylvania.

We put a call out for questions before this week and have already received some groovy ones. Go along 'em coming until Nov. vi (Ballot Day), and remember to register or check your voter status earlier October. 9.

Now, on to the questions.


"If I desire to vote libertarian, can I exist registered Contained, or is information technology like the primaries where I accept to chapter with Democrats or Republicans?"


You can vote for whatever candidate you want, regardless of your affiliation, in a general ballot.

If you don't believe me, here's a spokesperson for the Pa. Department of State saying the aforementioned affair: "All registered voters may cast ballots for the candidates of their choice — whatever party — in the general elections."

As the question asker correctly noted, Pennsylvania has partisan primaries — pregnant to vote for a Republican or Democrat, you have to be registered to that party. At that place's a move happening in the General Assembly to open up primaries to third-party and non-affiliated voters, simply in that location'southward no chance that could happen earlier November. 6, 2018.


"What do state-level candidates (gubernatorial/legislators) say virtually early learning?"


We went back to the question asker to narrow this question and landed on universal, free pre-Thousand. For the sake of this piece, nosotros'll focus on the gubernatorial candidates' stances.

Democrat Tom Wolf

Wolf made education the cornerstone of his first run for governor. In his 2018-19 budget proposal, he called for a $twoscore million increase for pre-K programs.

In the end, the General Assembly passed a bill with a $25 meg increase: $20 meg more than for Pre-One thousand Counts and $v million more than for Head Start.

Pre-K Counts is a grant plan administered past the country Section of Education to benefit low-income families. The department awards grants to school districts, high-quality childcare and Head Get-go programs, and plant nursery schools, which in plow allows families whose income is at or below 300 percentage of the federal poverty rate. (That's $75,300 for a family of four.)

Caput Start is a federal program that awards grants to providers who primarily serve kids from low-income families. Pennsylvania provides boosted money to grantees through Head Commencement Supplemental Help.

Republican Scott Wagner

Wagner released an education programme this summer that said he "will work with the General Assembly to continue this increase in funding for Pre-Thousand, working toward early pedagogy access for all Pennsylvania children."

In a questionnaire returned to the United Fashion, Wagner's campaign wrote, "The most effective mode to ensure there is adequate funding for such programs is to harness private funding."

That would include expanding the Educational Improvement Tax Credit Program, which allows private businesses to get a taxation break of up to $200,000 for funding pre-K scholarships.

Wagner's education plan also calls for the creation of a social impact bond "that volition provide upfront financing to support and expand those Pre-K programs that take been ranked by DHS as a three or 4-star educational facility, guaranteeing these vital learning centers have the support they need to enroll more students."

In the United Way questionnaire, Wagner added that these bonds "inject private sector dollars and accountability into the pre-g process and allow state taxpayers to know that they will simply be on the hook for investments that have worked."

Social affect bonds are a niggling controversial. In Utah, Goldman Sachs and the J.B. & M.G. Pritzker Family Foundation agreed to fund 3,500 pre-K seats for a $7 million investment. In turn, the school district and other parties involved agreed that success would exist measured by the number of "at-risk" students who avoided special didactics services in elementary school. Critics accept questioned whether this is truly a measure of how well the program works or whether private entities should have a say in setting standards for public education.

Now it's your turn. Ask us your questions about the upcoming election: